Introduction
There is a famous Upanishad story where Nachiketa goes to all extremes to find out the truth. In his pursuit he is not deterred by any impediment. As an enquirer he stands face to face with Yama, the God of death and shoots his questions. Yama is ultimately forced reveal all spiritual secrets of universe as the young Nachiketa won't relent.
This incident quoted from the 'Shruti" of Vedic tradition is the
most appropriate to create a ground for dispassionate inquiry about self, our
country, our civilization. There are no roads that should be left untraveled or
no proverbial stone that should be left unturned. The history of Indian
civilization is of grand twists and turns. An eternal flowing river from
Himalayas to the Indian Ocean. Whatever be the compulsions of contemporary
existence, the spirit of Nachiketa is akin to a Himalayan glacier which is
perennial source of what we call the flow of our civilization. The unhindered
uninhibited inquiry is what keeps the water afresh. It binds us to nothing and
makes oneself responsible to delve into new interpretations. That is precisely
the reason why this civilization throws giants among men and women every few
centuries. It gives rise to people who are ardent critics of the ritualistic
Vedas like Gautama, the Buddha. And same people who cannot think their life
apart from the rituals make him an icon, a God. It is the spirit, a deep
honesty of purpose, that symbolizes itself and become sacred with masses.
One such giant was Dr Ambedkar. He has delved into many contemporary
issues. He was completely blessed by the grace of the goddess of learning. The
dispassionate inquiries led him to areas where people are afraid to get into
even today. He could see the stagnation of ever flowing river of civilization
like none before him. He could gauge the causes of centuries of deprivation of
an ancient glorious civilization. He had the sagacity to rise beyond his own
self, dissolve his ego and his personal experience, as he had set out to
achieve a far bigger target. Hence, he is never bitter. Not when he is analysing
history, not when he is drafting Constitution of a new state. He could see
beyond the freedom movement He could visualize the importance of what it means
to build a society. What should be the contours of a new social contract. What
is going to be the role of each stakeholder in the societal frame. To achieve this,
he went deep into history, he investigated modern experiences and reconstructed
in front of us, the reasons behind them. In doing so he warns us of the
consequences of status quo. It may lead to some momentary gains for some group.
But as a civilization, this stagnation will lead to generations of pain and suffering.
In ancient India he would be a rishi. He must be understood, his writings need
to be discussed. As a society we need to pick the cudgels from where he left,
as knowledge was his only means, pen his only weapon. Unless we do that, we
will not be able to maintain the freedom that was won with so many sacrifices
over so many centuries. That is the imperative to building a strong, new
society.
So, let us visit him again with folded hands and seek his blessings. The
greatest service to him would not be a Bharat Ratna, but to visit him in his
writings. Let us try to resurrect him in his original self, look at the picture
he was trying to paint, the future that he was trying to warn us of, the road he
was trying to show. As he had seen like no other, he knew how the river will
find the Indian Ocean again!
Next episode eagerly awaited.
ReplyDeleteCould not agree more. There is no parallel to his erudition, his understanding of history, no ambuiguity in its interpretation, no subject beyond evaluation & criticism. The greatest disservice India has done is to box him as a Dalit leader. If there was ever a statesman that India produced, it would be him. Our first prime minister was not even remotely close.
ReplyDelete